Leave a comment
Get the GH Bookmarklet

Ask GH

Basic Stats:

Read the entire analysis here

  • MB

    Morgan Brown

    over 4 years ago #

    This is an amazing analysis!

    Biggest takeaway for me was:

    "63% of the GrowthHackers.com posts from Jan 5th to July 21 came from just 11 authors representing just 1.6% of the users that submitted posts that made it to the front page (650)."

    Need to work on getting more people to contribute rather than just consume and make it easier to find good content from new contributors to surface new content sources.

    • JS

      Jordan Skole

      over 4 years ago #

      Thanks @morgan!

      Prior to March 1st it seemed that even posts that had less than 4 votes still made it to the front page. After March 1st it appears they did not. It looked like post authors began to diversify dramatically more recently.

      • MB

        Morgan Brown

        over 4 years ago #

        Yep, we changed the front page algorithm on 3/1 to fight spam attacks with people submitting a ton of low quality content that would overwhelm the front page and kill engagement and visits.

  • ET

    Everette Taylor

    over 4 years ago #

    Wow this is great. Still think @AnujAdhiya is really a robot, what a machine. Thanks for the insights.

  • SE

    Sean Ellis

    over 4 years ago #

    Can't wait to dive into this!

  • BG

    Brandon Gains

    over 4 years ago #

    Great post by the team at Ambassador. Web scraping and data analysis are a great way to learn about common trends around the web. @francoismathieu did a similar analysis of GrowthHackers to find some common themes. He also used KimonoLabs to create the API. Here's the link to the original post: http://hub.francoismathieu.ca/h/i/16222907-hacking-into-growthhackers-analyzing-6-000-links/

    and the GH link: http://www.growthhackers.com/hacking-into-growthhackers-com/

    • JS

      Jordan Skole

      over 4 years ago #

      Wow, that's really cool. I didn't realize that @francoismathieu had already did a similar analysis. I wish I had thought to analyze the most common sources for content. I can't believe I missed that.

  • BH

    ben hoffman

    over 4 years ago #

    Great analysis. Thanks! Loved reading this.

    Your analysis regarding the "Must Read" category makes sense but you will notice that "Must Read" is not a category option when publishing content here.

    In fact, the reason why the analysis showed such great numbers for the MR category is because (I believe) only posts that hit a certain threshold are tagged with that category. Not sure if it is manual or automatic but the user does not get to decide. Notice how only posts with 20+ upvotes are in that category.

    Also, did you do a day / time analysis? I think you would find that this submission would have received many more upvotes if posted here on a Mon to Weds.

    • JS

      Jordan Skole

      over 4 years ago #

      Thanks for the feedback @benhoffman! re: "Must Read" I thought that was the case but wasn't certain so I just hopped over it.

      I did not do analysis by day, however that wouldn't be very difficult since I extracted the post date.

  • CO

    Chris Out

    over 4 years ago #

    Very insightful @jordanskole!

Join over 70,000 growth pros from companies like Uber, Pinterest & Twitter

Get Weekly Top Posts
High five! You’re in.
SHARE
21
21